Skip to content
Peter M Howard (Contact Options) ::

Peter Howard is Wintermute, mythologist

The site of a film student and geek from Sydney, Australia. Most of the content on the site is arranged under ?bits, which you can navigate by post, month, or category. You may want to subscribe to the Atom feed.

wintermute :: bits

You are currently viewing an individual bits entry. You can navigate individual entries through time, or navigate the archives via the options at the bottom of the page

« I don't HATE Microsoft :: Elizabethtown »

Turing's Cathedral

29October2005 [directLink] [myth]
This item was changed on 05June2006

Interesting essay by George Dyson on the history of digital computing; the really interesting part comes in some speculation at the very end. Alan Turing, a founding father of computing and AI, wrote that in creating intelligent machines, we are not usurping God’s role as Creator of souls; we are merely creating bodies, “mansions for the souls that He creates”. As most of the article is historical, I’ll quote the rather sci-fi ending here:

Google is Turing’s cathedral, awaiting its soul. We hope. In the words of an unusually perceptive friend: “When I was there, just before the IPO, I thought the coziness to be almost overwhelming. Happy Golden Retrievers running in slow motion through water sprinklers on the lawn. People waving and smiling, toys everywhere. I immediately suspected that unimaginable evil was happening somewhere in the dark corners. If the devil would come to earth, what place would be better to hide?”

For 30 years I have been wondering, what indication of its existence might we expect from a true AI? Certainly not any explicit revelation, which might spark a movement to pull the plug. Anomalous accumulation or creation of wealth might be a sign, or an unquenchable thirst for raw information, storage space, and processing cycles, or a concerted attempt to secure an uninterrupted, autonomous power supply. But the real sign, I suspect, would be a circle of cheerful, contented, intellectually and physically well-nourished people surrounding the AI. There wouldn’t be any need for True Believers, or the downloading of human brains or anything sinister like that: just a gradual, gentle, pervasive and mutually beneficial contact between us and a growing something else. This remains a non-testable hypothesis, for now. The best description comes from science fiction writer Simon Ings:

“When our machines overtook us, too complex and efficient for us to control, they did it so fast and so smoothly and so usefully, only a fool or a prophet would have dared complain.”

Source: Edge 24Oct2005

« I don't HATE Microsoft :: Elizabethtown »

Related [myth]

photos :: recent albums
photos :: random